Editorial policy

Global Spotlight aims to make clear, careful writing about objects and material culture. We explain what we can support, mark uncertainty where it matters and correct errors when they are brought to our attention.

Accuracy and sourcing

Writers should check factual claims against suitable sources and keep a clear distinction between observation, interpretation and documented history. We do not invent quotations, origins or technical explanations. If evidence is limited or accounts differ, the article should say so rather than smoothing the uncertainty away.

Independence and corrections

Editorial choices are made for their relevance to the publication, not to secure favourable coverage. Readers can send corrections through the Contact page, identifying the passage and explaining the concern. We review substantiated errors and amend published wording when needed; significant changes should be made clear in the article.

Partner material

Paid or otherwise supported material is identified plainly as a partnership or advertisement, and kept distinct from independent editorial work. A partner does not receive control over editorial conclusions. Any links or placements are labelled so readers can tell why they appear.

Images and illustrations

Images should clarify the subject and be presented without misleading edits. Some illustrations may be generated with artificial intelligence; when used, they are identified as illustrations rather than documentary photographs. Captions should not imply that a generated image records a real object or event.